↓ Skip to main content

Modelling the probability of erroneous negative lymph node staging in patients with colon cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Communications, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modelling the probability of erroneous negative lymph node staging in patients with colon cancer
Published in
Cancer Communications, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40880-019-0377-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlos Fortea-Sanchis, Erica Forcadell-Comes, David Martínez-Ramos, Javier Escrig-Sos

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 25%
Lecturer 2 25%
Student > Master 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 25%
Computer Science 1 13%
Materials Science 1 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2020.
All research outputs
#15,303,896
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Communications
#120
of 286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,761
of 351,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Communications
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 286 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.