You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Maternal iodine status, intrauterine growth, birth outcomes and congenital anomalies in a UK birth cohort
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medicine, June 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12916-020-01602-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Charles Jonathan Peter Snart, Diane Erin Threapleton, Claire Keeble, Elizabeth Taylor, Dagmar Waiblinger, Stephen Reid, Nisreen A. Alwan, Dan Mason, Rafaq Azad, Janet Elizabeth Cade, Nigel A. B. Simpson, Sarah Meadows, Amanda McKillion, Gillian Santorelli, Amanda H. Waterman, Michael Zimmermann, Paul M. Stewart, John Wright, Mark Mon-Williams, Darren Charles Greenwood, Laura J. Hardie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
Mexico | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 12% |
Unknown | 33 | 49% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 22% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 12% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
Engineering | 2 | 3% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
Other | 6 | 9% |
Unknown | 33 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2020.
All research outputs
#15,635,524
of 24,769,082 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#3,248
of 3,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,926
of 403,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#93
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,769,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,834 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.8. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.