↓ Skip to main content

Human Toxoplasma gondii infection in Nigeria: a systematic review and meta-analysis of data published between 1960 and 2019

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Human Toxoplasma gondii infection in Nigeria: a systematic review and meta-analysis of data published between 1960 and 2019
Published in
BMC Public Health, June 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12889-020-09015-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Solomon Ngutor Karshima, Magdalene Nguvan Karshima

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 119 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Student > Master 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Researcher 7 6%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 44 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 21%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 8 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 49 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2020.
All research outputs
#14,429,306
of 23,225,652 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#10,470
of 15,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,272
of 398,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#260
of 385 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,225,652 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 385 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.