You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The spatial distribution of illegal hunting of terrestrial mammals in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic map
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Evidence, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13750-020-00195-8 |
| Authors |
Isla Duporge, Timothy Hodgetts, Tiejun Wang, David W. Macdonald |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
| Australia | 1 | 13% |
| Uganda | 1 | 13% |
| Canada | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 74 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 25 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 27% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 26 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2020.
All research outputs
#5,922,128
of 24,265,140 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#188
of 315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,623
of 402,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,265,140 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.