You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Left ventricular functional recovery of infarcted and remote myocardium after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (METOCARD-CNIC randomized clinical trial substudy)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12968-020-00638-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tomaž Podlesnikar, Gonzalo Pizarro, Rodrigo Fernández-Jiménez, Jose M. Montero-Cabezas, Nina Greif, Javier Sánchez-González, Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci, Nina Ajmone Marsan, Zlatko Fras, Jeroen J. Bax, Valentin Fuster, Borja Ibáñez, Victoria Delgado |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 9 | 56% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 63% |
| Scientists | 4 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Librarian | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 18% |
| Unknown | 26 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 26 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2022.
All research outputs
#3,035,741
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#155
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,838
of 434,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#4
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.