You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Analysis and comprehensive comparison of PacBio and nanopore-based RNA sequencing of the Arabidopsis transcriptome
|
---|---|
Published in |
Plant Methods, June 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13007-020-00629-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jiawen Cui, Nan shen, Zhaogeng Lu, Guolu Xu, Yuyao Wang, Biao Jin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 3 | 23% |
Russia | 2 | 15% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 15% |
United States | 1 | 8% |
Portugal | 1 | 8% |
Canada | 1 | 8% |
Italy | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 2 | 15% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 62% |
Scientists | 3 | 23% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 176 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 29 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 7% |
Student > Master | 9 | 5% |
Other | 19 | 11% |
Unknown | 63 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 40 | 23% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 20% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 2% |
Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
Design | 3 | 2% |
Other | 16 | 9% |
Unknown | 74 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2022.
All research outputs
#2,038,966
of 23,151,189 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#96
of 1,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,671
of 398,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#3
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,189 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,096 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.