↓ Skip to main content

Single-cell sequencing reveals karyotype heterogeneity in murine and human malignancies

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
12 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
198 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
276 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Single-cell sequencing reveals karyotype heterogeneity in murine and human malignancies
Published in
Genome Biology, May 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13059-016-0971-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bjorn Bakker, Aaron Taudt, Mirjam E. Belderbos, David Porubsky, Diana C. J. Spierings, Tristan V. de Jong, Nancy Halsema, Hinke G. Kazemier, Karina Hoekstra-Wakker, Allan Bradley, Eveline S. J. M. de Bont, Anke van den Berg, Victor Guryev, Peter M. Lansdorp, Maria Colomé-Tatché, Floris Foijer

Abstract

Chromosome instability leads to aneuploidy, a state in which cells have abnormal numbers of chromosomes, and is found in two out of three cancers. In a chromosomal instable p53 deficient mouse model with accelerated lymphomagenesis, we previously observed whole chromosome copy number changes affecting all lymphoma cells. This suggests that chromosome instability is somehow suppressed in the aneuploid lymphomas or that selection for frequently lost/gained chromosomes out-competes the CIN-imposed mis-segregation. To distinguish between these explanations and to examine karyotype dynamics in chromosome instable lymphoma, we use a newly developed single-cell whole genome sequencing (scWGS) platform that provides a complete and unbiased overview of copy number variations (CNV) in individual cells. To analyse these scWGS data, we develop AneuFinder, which allows annotation of copy number changes in a fully automated fashion and quantification of CNV heterogeneity between cells. Single-cell sequencing and AneuFinder analysis reveals high levels of copy number heterogeneity in chromosome instability-driven murine T-cell lymphoma samples, indicating ongoing chromosome instability. Application of this technology to human B cell leukaemias reveals different levels of karyotype heterogeneity in these cancers. Our data show that even though aneuploid tumours select for particular and recurring chromosome combinations, single-cell analysis using AneuFinder reveals copy number heterogeneity. This suggests ongoing chromosome instability that other platforms fail to detect. As chromosome instability might drive tumour evolution, karyotype analysis using single-cell sequencing technology could become an essential tool for cancer treatment stratification.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 276 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 269 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 23%
Researcher 50 18%
Student > Bachelor 45 16%
Student > Master 34 12%
Student > Postgraduate 11 4%
Other 35 13%
Unknown 38 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 101 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 10%
Computer Science 14 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 1%
Other 18 7%
Unknown 44 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,025,922
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#737
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,135
of 353,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#19
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,676 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.