You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A focused netnographic study exploring experiences associated with counterfeit and contaminated anabolic-androgenic steroids
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Harm Reduction Journal, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12954-020-00387-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Evelyn Frude, Fiona H. McKay, Matthew Dunn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 8 | 44% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Norway | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 56% |
| Scientists | 8 | 44% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 21 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 8% |
| Psychology | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 16% |
| Unknown | 23 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2020.
All research outputs
#3,018,918
of 23,674,309 outputs
Outputs from Harm Reduction Journal
#418
of 971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,242
of 400,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Harm Reduction Journal
#11
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,674,309 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 971 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.