| Title |
Using online technologies to improve diversity and inclusion in cognitive interviews with young people
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-020-01024-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ushma D. Upadhyay, Heather Lipkovich |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 19% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 14 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 71% |
| Scientists | 5 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 271 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 271 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 38 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 52 | 19% |
| Unknown | 77 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 14% |
| Psychology | 30 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 24 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 53 | 20% |
| Unknown | 90 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,772,677
of 24,858,211 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#231
of 2,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,318
of 377,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#16
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,858,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.