You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Characterization of ZnO nanoparticles grown in presence of Folic acid template
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-3155-10-29 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sreetama Dutta, Bichitra N Ganguly |
| Abstract |
ZnO nanoparticles (grown in the template of folic acid) are biologically useful, luminescent material. It can be used for multifunctional purposes, e.g., as biosensor, bioimaging, targeted drug delivery and as growth promoting medicine. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 105 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 31% |
| Researcher | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Professor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 19 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 30 | 28% |
| Materials Science | 14 | 13% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 12 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 9% |
| Engineering | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 25 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2012.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#816
of 1,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,588
of 177,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#11
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,919 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.