You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impetus to change: a multi-site qualitative exploration of the national audit of dementia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-020-01004-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael Sykes, Richard Thomson, Niina Kolehmainen, Louise Allan, Tracy Finch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 38% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 42% |
| Scientists | 9 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
| Researcher | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 8 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 9% |
| Psychology | 1 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,347,060
of 25,839,971 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#458
of 1,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,264
of 435,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#16
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,839,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.