You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The impact of vitamin D food fortification and health outcomes in children: a systematic review and meta-regression
|
---|---|
Published in |
Systematic Reviews, June 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13643-020-01360-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Reem Al Khalifah, Rawan Alsheikh, Yossef Alnasser, Rana Alsheikh, Nora Alhelali, Ammar Naji, Nouf Al Backer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Saudi Arabia | 7 | 23% |
France | 2 | 6% |
United States | 2 | 6% |
India | 1 | 3% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 17 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 22 | 71% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 16% |
Scientists | 4 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 116 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 19 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
Other | 6 | 5% |
Unspecified | 6 | 5% |
Researcher | 6 | 5% |
Other | 16 | 14% |
Unknown | 51 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 12% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 8% |
Unspecified | 6 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
Other | 12 | 10% |
Unknown | 57 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,596,483
of 24,038,559 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#251
of 2,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,739
of 374,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#5
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,038,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.