You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reliability of ITV approach to varying treatment fraction time: a retrospective analysis based on 2D cine MR images
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Radiation Oncology, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13014-020-01530-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Davide Cusumano, Jennifer Dhont, Luca Boldrini, Giuditta Chiloiro, Angela Romano, Claudio Votta, Silvia Longo, Lorenzo Placidi, Luigi Azario, Marco De Spirito, Dirk Verellen, Vincenzo Valentini |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| France | 1 | 33% |
| Belgium | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 14% |
| Researcher | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 9 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 25% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 12 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2020.
All research outputs
#13,043,494
of 23,215,490 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#555
of 2,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,780
of 399,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#17
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,215,490 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,086 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.