You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Chimeric Hepatitis B core antigen virus-like particles displaying the envelope domain III of dengue virus type 2
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-3155-10-30 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Upasana Arora, Poornima Tyagi, Sathyamangalam Swaminathan, Navin Khanna |
| Abstract |
Dengue is a global public health problem for which no drug or vaccine is available. Currently, there is increasing interest in developing non-replicating dengue vaccines based on a discrete antigenic domain of the major structural protein of dengue viruses (DENVs), known as envelope domain III (EDIII). The use of bio-nanoparticles consisting of recombinant viral structural polypeptides, better known as virus-like particles (VLPs), has emerged as a potential platform technology for vaccine development. This work explores the feasibility of developing nanoparticles based on E. coli-expressed recombinant Hepatitis B virus core antigen (HBcAg) designed to display EDIII moiety of DENV on the surface. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 1% |
| French Polynesia | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 91 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 23% |
| Researcher | 16 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 13 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 39% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 11 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2016.
All research outputs
#6,246,656
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#209
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,057
of 164,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.