↓ Skip to main content

Glucose levels as a prognostic marker in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a case–control study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Endocrine Disorders, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Glucose levels as a prognostic marker in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a case–control study
Published in
BMC Endocrine Disorders, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12902-016-0108-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Victoria Karetnikova, Olga Gruzdeva, Evgenya Uchasova, Anastasia Osokina, Olga Barbarash

Abstract

Patients with myocardial infarction (MI) have a high mortality. Therefore, new risk markers and predictors of an adverse outcome for MI are required. The role of hyperglycemia in the development of cardiovascular complications in MI patients is still unclear. A total of 529 consecutive patients with the diagnosis of ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome within 24 h of the onset of symptoms were included in the study. All of the patients underwent blood glucose measurement at admission to hospital. The glycemic profile, including measurement of blood glucose levels early in the night and in the morning (3 a.m. and 5 a.m.), was assessed in 77 patients with diabetes on days 6-10 of the course of MI to monitor the efficiency of blood glucose-lowering therapy and to detect hypoglycemic episodes. In-hospital mortality showed relationship between the level of blood glucose on admission and in-hospital mortality in patients with MI with ST-segment elevation in combination with diabetes mellitus. There was a direct linear relationship between blood glucose levels and in-hospital mortality in patients without diabetes. Episodes of hypoglycemia recorded in MI patients with diabetes in the hospital stage of treatment do not determine the prognosis, but enable identification of patients with an unfavorable course in the postinfarction period.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 6 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Researcher 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 12 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Mathematics 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 12 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2016.
All research outputs
#20,330,976
of 22,875,477 outputs
Outputs from BMC Endocrine Disorders
#615
of 759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#291,643
of 339,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Endocrine Disorders
#14
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,875,477 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 759 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.