You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Use of health systems evidence by policymakers in eastern mediterranean countries: views, practices, and contextual influences
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-12-200 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fadi El-Jardali, John N Lavis, Nour Ataya, Diana Jamal, Walid Ammar, Saned Raouf |
| Abstract |
Health systems evidence can enhance policymaking and strengthen national health systems. In the Middle East, limited research exists on the use of evidence in the policymaking process. This multi-country study explored policymakers' views and practices regarding the use of health systems evidence in health policymaking in 10 eastern Mediterranean countries, including factors that influence health policymaking and barriers and facilitators to the use of evidence. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 120 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 15% |
| Researcher | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 20% |
| Unknown | 26 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 28% |
| Social Sciences | 25 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 14% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 30 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2022.
All research outputs
#6,949,499
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,410
of 7,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,284
of 163,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#50
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,626 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.