| Title |
“War to the knife” against thromboinflammation to protect endothelial function of COVID-19 patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03060-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gabriele Guglielmetti, Marco Quaglia, Pier Paolo Sainaghi, Luigi Mario Castello, Rosanna Vaschetto, Mario Pirisi, Francesco Della Corte, Gian Carlo Avanzi, Piero Stratta, Vincenzo Cantaluppi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 6% |
| India | 2 | 4% |
| Italy | 2 | 4% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 24 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 79% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 15% |
| Scientists | 2 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 116 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 11% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 24 | 21% |
| Unknown | 36 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 49 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,544,526
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,365
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,512
of 433,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#62
of 224 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 224 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.