| Title |
How to strengthen a health research system: WHO’s review, whose literature and who is providing leadership?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12961-020-00581-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephen R. Hanney, Lucy Kanya, Subhash Pokhrel, Teresa H. Jones, Annette Boaz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 15 | 26% |
| Colombia | 11 | 19% |
| Nigeria | 8 | 14% |
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 15 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 41 | 71% |
| Scientists | 12 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 205 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 14% |
| Researcher | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 18% |
| Unknown | 73 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 38 | 19% |
| Unknown | 82 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2023.
All research outputs
#713,804
of 25,287,709 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#42
of 1,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,750
of 406,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#4
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,287,709 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,378 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.