↓ Skip to main content

Tracking implementation strategies in the randomized rollout of a Veterans Affairs national opioid risk management initiative

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tracking implementation strategies in the randomized rollout of a Veterans Affairs national opioid risk management initiative
Published in
Implementation Science, June 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13012-020-01005-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shari S. Rogal, Matthew Chinman, Walid F. Gellad, Maria K. Mor, Hongwei Zhang, Sharon A. McCarthy, Genna T. Mauro, Jennifer A. Hale, Eleanor T. Lewis, Elizabeth M. Oliva, Jodie A. Trafton, Vera Yakovchenko, Adam J. Gordon, Leslie R. M. Hausmann

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Researcher 4 6%
Other 3 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 35 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Psychology 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 37 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,578,972
of 23,217,343 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#878
of 1,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,483
of 400,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#21
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,217,343 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,728 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.