| Title |
Mobilization practices in critically ill children: a European point prevalence study (EU PARK-PICU)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-02988-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Erwin Ista, Barnaby R. Scholefield, Joseph C. Manning, Irene Harth, Orsola Gawronski, Alicja Bartkowska-Śniatkowska, Anne-Sylvie Ramelet, Sapna R. Kudchadkar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 138 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 27 | 20% |
| United States | 17 | 12% |
| Australia | 6 | 4% |
| India | 5 | 4% |
| Spain | 5 | 4% |
| Canada | 4 | 3% |
| Italy | 3 | 2% |
| Uruguay | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 20 | 14% |
| Unknown | 46 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 79 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 27 | 20% |
| Scientists | 23 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 120 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 18% |
| Unknown | 50 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 14 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 52 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2023.
All research outputs
#516,052
of 25,804,096 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#313
of 6,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,038
of 436,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#12
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,804,096 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,623 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.