| Title |
Protocol for awake prone positioning in COVID-19 patients: to do it earlier, easier, and longer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03096-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guy Bower, Hangyong He |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 23 | 43% |
| Colombia | 3 | 6% |
| United States | 3 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 21 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 45 | 85% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 13% |
| Scientists | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 116 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 25 | 22% |
| Unknown | 27 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 42% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 19% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 32 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,111,419
of 25,610,986 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#887
of 6,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,675
of 435,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#40
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,610,986 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,587 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.