↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of a medication-adherence tool: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of a medication-adherence tool: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13063-016-1393-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mirrian Hilbink, Joyca Lacroix, Linda Bremer - van der Heiden, Aart van Halteren, Martina Teichert, Jan van Lieshout

Abstract

Research shows that more than half of the people taking medication for a chronic condition are non-adherent. Nonadherence hinders disease control with a burden on patient quality of life and healthcare systems. We developed a tool that provides insight into nonadherence risks and barriers for medication-adherence including an intervention strategy to overcome those barriers. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of using this adherence tool in starters with cardiovascular or oral blood glucose-lowering medication to improve medication-adherence. In a cluster-randomized controlled trial 25 pharmacies in the Netherlands will be randomized to the intervention or control arm. Patients registered in a general practice participating in a collaborative can be included when they start cardiovascular or oral blood glucose-lowering medication prescribed by their general practitioner. Participants complete an assessment consisting of measuring nonadherence risk and potential barriers to adherence. For patients with an increased nonadherence risk, a graphic barrier profile is created, showing to what extent eight cognitive, emotional, or practical barriers are present. All patients will fill in the medication-adherence assessment twice: between 1 and 2 weeks after the start of the medication and after 8 months. The intervention strategy consists of discussing this barrier profile to overcome barriers. Pharmacists and assistants of the intervention pharmacies are trained in discussing the profile and to offer a tailored intervention to overcome barriers. In the control arm, patients receive care as usual. The primary outcome is medication-adherence of patients with a high risk of nonadherence at 8 months follow-up. Secondary outcomes include the difference in the percentage of patients with an increased nonadherence risk between intervention and control group after 8 months, the predictive values of the baseline questionnaire in the control group in relation to medication-adherence after 8 months, medication-adherence after 1 year follow-up, and barriers and facilitators in the implementation of the tool. This manuscript presents the protocol for a cluster-randomized clinical trial on the use of an adherence tool to improve medication-adherence. This study will provide insight into the effectiveness of the tool in starters with cardiovascular or oral blood glucose-lowering medication in improvement of medication-adherence. The Netherlands National Trial Register, NTR5186 . Registered on 18 May 2015.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 188 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 11%
Student > Bachelor 21 11%
Researcher 17 9%
Other 14 7%
Other 33 18%
Unknown 59 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 27 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 11%
Psychology 9 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 3%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 66 35%