You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Nitrogen dioxide levels estimated from land use regression models several years apart and association with mortality in a large cohort study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental Health, July 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1476-069x-11-48 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Giulia Cesaroni, Daniela Porta, Chiara Badaloni, Massimo Stafoggia, Marloes Eeftens, Kees Meliefste, Francesco Forastiere |
Abstract |
Land Use Regression models (LUR) are useful to estimate the spatial variability of air pollution in urban areas. Few studies have evaluated the stability of spatial contrasts in outdoor nitrogen dioxide (NO₂) concentration over several years. We aimed to compare measured and estimated NO₂ levels 12 years apart, the stability of the exposure estimates for members of a large cohort study, and the association of the exposure estimates with natural mortality within the cohort. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 2 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Belarus | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 113 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 37 | 31% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 22% |
Student > Master | 15 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 3% |
Other | 15 | 13% |
Unknown | 16 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 38 | 32% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
Engineering | 5 | 4% |
Computer Science | 5 | 4% |
Other | 19 | 16% |
Unknown | 30 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2019.
All research outputs
#13,903,378
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#1,003
of 1,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,052
of 165,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#14
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.