You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Early prediction of high flow nasal cannula therapy outcomes using a modified ROX index incorporating heart rate
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Intensive Care, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40560-020-00458-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ken Junyang Goh, Hui Zhong Chai, Thun How Ong, Duu Wen Sewa, Ghee Chee Phua, Qiao Li Tan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 21 | 39% |
| Chile | 3 | 6% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 2% |
| Guinea | 1 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Honduras | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 23 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 49 | 91% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 127 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 13% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 14% |
| Unknown | 48 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 53 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,028,445
of 24,384,616 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#38
of 548 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,691
of 403,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,384,616 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 548 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.