You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Metabolic factors in osteoarthritis: obese people do not walk on their hands
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Arthritis Research & Therapy, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/ar3894 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Erlangga Yusuf |
| Abstract |
ABSTRACT: Obesity is an important risk factor for the development and progression of osteoarthritis (OA). Recently, the paradigm that obesity predisposes people to OA because of extra-mechanical loading only has shifted to the paradigm that metabolic factors (adipokines) are also involved in the pathophysiology of OA. In a cross-sectional study in the previous issue of Arthritis Research & Therapy, Massengale and colleagues investigated the association between one of the adipokines - leptin - and hand OA. Hand joints are an ideal target to investigate the role of adipokines since they are not weight-bearing. Interestingly, no association with OA was found, bringing into question a metabolic, rather than a mechanical, explanation for the association between obesity and OA. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 143 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 30 | 21% |
| United States | 14 | 10% |
| Australia | 9 | 6% |
| Spain | 8 | 6% |
| Canada | 7 | 5% |
| India | 4 | 3% |
| Malaysia | 3 | 2% |
| Belgium | 3 | 2% |
| Ireland | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 16 | 11% |
| Unknown | 47 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 120 | 84% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 8% |
| Scientists | 11 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 79 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 16% |
| Researcher | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 24% |
| Unknown | 15 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 9% |
| Engineering | 6 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 21 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 92. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2024.
All research outputs
#474,987
of 25,856,138 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#28
of 3,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,170
of 178,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#1
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,856,138 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,420 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.