↓ Skip to main content

LIVE@Home.Path—innovating the clinical pathway for home-dwelling people with dementia and their caregivers: study protocol for a mixed-method, stepped-wedge, randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
LIVE@Home.Path—innovating the clinical pathway for home-dwelling people with dementia and their caregivers: study protocol for a mixed-method, stepped-wedge, randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, June 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13063-020-04414-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bettina Sandgathe Husebo, Heather Allore, Wilco Achterberg, Renira Corinne Angeles, Clive Ballard, Frøydis Kristine Bruvik, Stein Erik Fæø, Marie Hidle Gedde, Eirin Hillestad, Frode Fadnes Jacobsen, Øyvind Kirkevold, Egil Kjerstad, Reidun Lisbeth Skeide Kjome, Janne Mannseth, Mala Naik, Rui Nouchi, Nathalie Puaschitz, Rune Samdal, Oscar Tranvåg, Charalampos Tzoulis, Ipsit Vihang Vahia, Maarja Vislapuu, Line Iden Berge

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Master 7 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 4%
Librarian 4 4%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 36 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 14%
Psychology 7 8%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 41 45%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2020.
All research outputs
#11,467,028
of 18,829,177 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#3,013
of 4,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,160
of 299,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,829,177 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,882 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them