↓ Skip to main content

Antibiotic treatment for intermittent bladder catheterisation with once daily prophylaxis (the AnTIC study): Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antibiotic treatment for intermittent bladder catheterisation with once daily prophylaxis (the AnTIC study): Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Published in
Trials, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13063-016-1389-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine Brennand, Alexander von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, Sarah Dunn, Jennifer Wilkinson, Thomas Chadwick, Laura Ternent, Yemi Oluboyede, Ruth Wood, Katherine Walton, Mandy Fader, James N’Dow, Mohamed Abdel-Fattah, Doreen McClurg, Paul Little, Paul Hilton, Anthony Timoney, Nicola Morris, Nikesh Thiruchelvam, James Larcombe, Simon Harrison, Heather Armstrong, Elaine McColl, Robert Pickard

Abstract

Clean intermittent self-catheterisation is an important management option for people who cannot empty their bladder effectively. Recurrent urinary tract infections are common in these patients. Data from recent studies suggest that antibiotic prophylaxis may be beneficial in reducing infection risk, but the effectiveness of this intervention remains uncertain. This is a 52-site, patient randomised superiority trial set in routine care comparing an experimental strategy of once daily antibiotic prophylaxis for 12 months against a control strategy of no prophylaxis in people who carry out self-catheterisation and suffer recurrent urinary tract infections. The primary outcome is number of urinary tract infections during a 12-month treatment period. Both groups will otherwise receive usual care including on demand treatment courses of antibiotics for urinary tract infection. Participants and their clinicians will not be blinded to the allocated intervention, but central trial staff managing and analysing trial data will, as far as possible, be unaware of participant allocation. The analysis will follow intention-to-treat principles. This trial was commissioned and funded by the United Kingdom National Health Service following prioritisation of the research question by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. ISRCTN67145101 EUDRACT2013-002556-32. Registered on 25 October 2013.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 18%
Other 6 9%
Researcher 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Other 14 21%
Unknown 19 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 23 35%