You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of robotic-assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living and upper limb function after stroke
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12984-020-00715-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jan Mehrholz, Alex Pollock, Marcus Pohl, Joachim Kugler, Bernhard Elsner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 25% |
| Colombia | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 150 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 12% |
| Researcher | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Unknown | 69 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 20% |
| Engineering | 12 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 11% |
| Unknown | 72 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2020.
All research outputs
#14,275,291
of 23,321,213 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#709
of 1,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,944
of 398,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#25
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,321,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.