You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Dynamic waitlisted design for evaluating a randomized trial of evidence-based quality improvement of comprehensive women’s health care implementation in low-performing VA facilities
|
---|---|
Published in |
Implementation Science Communications, June 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s43058-020-00038-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alison B. Hamilton, Tanya T. Olmos-Ochoa, Ismelda Canelo, Danielle Rose, Katherine J. Hoggatt, Claire Than, Elizabeth M. Yano |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
Unspecified | 2 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 9% |
Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 14% |
Unknown | 9 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 14% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 9% |
Unspecified | 2 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 9% |
Linguistics | 1 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 14% |
Unknown | 9 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2020.
All research outputs
#13,328,782
of 23,220,133 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science Communications
#282
of 392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,880
of 398,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science Communications
#12
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,220,133 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.