You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How methodological frameworks are being developed: evidence from a scoping review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-020-01061-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicola McMeekin, Olivia Wu, Evi Germeni, Andrew Briggs |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 33% |
| South Africa | 4 | 15% |
| Ireland | 2 | 7% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Greece | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 67% |
| Scientists | 5 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 221 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 11% |
| Researcher | 19 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 12 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 35 | 16% |
| Unknown | 85 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 16 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 15 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 14 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 55 | 25% |
| Unknown | 94 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2021.
All research outputs
#2,213,316
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#302
of 2,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,475
of 433,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#18
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.