↓ Skip to main content

Biofilm formation on three different endotracheal tubes: a prospective clinical trial

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
28 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biofilm formation on three different endotracheal tubes: a prospective clinical trial
Published in
Critical Care, June 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13054-020-03092-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hulda R. Thorarinsdottir, Thomas Kander, Anna Holmberg, Sarunas Petronis, Bengt Klarin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Master 6 8%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 34 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 38 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,497,881
of 25,756,531 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,166
of 6,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,309
of 434,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#84
of 218 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 218 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.