↓ Skip to main content

A preliminary DTI study showing no brain structural change associated with adolescent cannabis use

Overview of attention for article published in Harm Reduction Journal, May 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
16 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A preliminary DTI study showing no brain structural change associated with adolescent cannabis use
Published in
Harm Reduction Journal, May 2006
DOI 10.1186/1477-7517-3-17
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lynn E DeLisi, Hilary C Bertisch, Kamila U Szulc, Magda Majcher, Kyle Brown, Arthika Bappal, Babak A Ardekani

Abstract

Analyses were performed on brain MRI scans from individuals who were frequent cannabis users (N = 10; 9 males, 1 female, mean age 21.1 +/- 2.9, range: 18-27) in adolescence and similar age and sex matched young adults who never used cannabis (N = 10; 9 males, 1 female, mean age of 23.0 +/- 4.4, range: 17-30). Cerebral atrophy and white matter integrity were determined using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) to quantify the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and the fractional anisotropy (FA). Whole brain volumes, lateral ventricular volumes, and gray matter volumes of the amygdala-hippocampal complex, superior temporal gyrus, and entire temporal lobes (excluding the amygdala-hippocampal complex) were also measured. While differences existed between groups, no pattern consistent with evidence of cerebral atrophy or loss of white matter integrity was detected. It is concluded that frequent cannabis use is unlikely to be neurotoxic to the normal developing adolescent brain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Czechia 1 1%
Unknown 68 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Student > Master 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Student > Bachelor 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 51 74%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 6 9%
Psychology 5 7%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 53 77%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2020.
All research outputs
#955,188
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Harm Reduction Journal
#162
of 1,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,400
of 83,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Harm Reduction Journal
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,119 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them