↓ Skip to main content

Analytical evaluation of the clonoSEQ Assay for establishing measurable (minimal) residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and multiple myeloma

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Analytical evaluation of the clonoSEQ Assay for establishing measurable (minimal) residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and multiple myeloma
Published in
BMC Cancer, June 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12885-020-07077-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Travers Ching, Megan E. Duncan, Tera Newman-Eerkes, Mollie M. E. McWhorter, Jeffrey M. Tracy, Michelle S. Steen, Ryan P. Brown, Srivatsa Venkatasubbarao, Nicholas K. Akers, Marissa Vignali, Martin E. Moorhead, Drew Watson, Ryan O. Emerson, Tobias P. Mann, B. Melina Cimler, Pamela L. Swatkowski, Ilan R. Kirsch, Charles Sang, Harlan S. Robins, Bryan Howie, Anna Sherwood

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 4 7%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 20 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 21 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2021.
All research outputs
#6,072,905
of 24,213,825 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#1,477
of 8,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,216
of 402,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#44
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,213,825 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,603 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.