↓ Skip to main content

Skeletal muscle gene expression in response to resistance exercise: sex specific regulation

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Skeletal muscle gene expression in response to resistance exercise: sex specific regulation
Published in
BMC Genomics, November 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-11-659
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dongmei Liu, Maureen A Sartor, Gustavo A Nader, Laurie Gutmann, Mary K Treutelaar, Emidio E Pistilli, Heidi B IglayReger, Charles F Burant, Eric P Hoffman, Paul M Gordon

Abstract

The molecular mechanisms underlying the sex differences in human muscle morphology and function remain to be elucidated. The sex differences in the skeletal muscle transcriptome in both the resting state and following anabolic stimuli, such as resistance exercise (RE), might provide insight to the contributors of sexual dimorphism of muscle phenotypes. We used microarrays to profile the transcriptome of the biceps brachii of young men and women who underwent an acute unilateral RE session following 12 weeks of progressive training. Bilateral muscle biopsies were obtained either at an early (4 h post-exercise) or late recovery (24 h post-exercise) time point. Muscle transcription profiles were compared in the resting state between men (n = 6) and women (n = 8), and in response to acute RE in trained exercised vs. untrained non-exercised control muscle for each sex and time point separately (4 h post-exercise, n = 3 males, n = 4 females; 24 h post-exercise, n = 3 males, n = 4 females). A logistic regression-based method (LRpath), following Bayesian moderated t-statistic (IMBT), was used to test gene functional groups and biological pathways enriched with differentially expressed genes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 157 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 23%
Student > Master 20 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Researcher 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 31 19%
Unknown 30 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 20%
Sports and Recreations 28 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 39 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2017.
All research outputs
#12,935,734
of 23,149,216 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#4,437
of 10,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,967
of 181,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#56
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,149,216 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,712 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.