Validity of clinically significant change classifications yielded by Jacobson-Truax and Hageman-Arrindell methods

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, June 2016

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter: 2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation: 19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley: 56 Mendeley

Summary X Dimensions citations

So far, Dimensions has found 19 publications that cite this research output.

19

The most recent citing publications are shown below. View all 19 publications that cite this research output on Dimensions.

When (Not) to Rely on the Reliable Change Index: A Critical Appraisal and Alternatives to Consider in Clinical Psychology

Article in Clinical Psychology Science and Practice (April 2024)

Comparison of false positive and false negative rates of two indices of individual reliable change: Jacobson-Truax and Hageman-Arrindell methods

Article in Frontiers in Psychology (July 2023)

Health economic evaluation of a randomized controlled trial (EMBLA study), an internet-based treatment for provoked vulvodynia

Article in Scientific Reports (April 2023)

This page shows the most recent citations of this research output.

Click here to find out how to access more activity.