You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Recommendations for core critical care ultrasound competencies as a part of specialist training in multidisciplinary intensive care: a framework proposed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03099-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adrian Wong, Laura Galarza, Lui Forni, Daniel De Backer, Michael Slama, Bernard Cholley, Paul Mayo, Anthony McLean, Antoine Vieillard-Baron, Daniel Lichtenstein, Giovanni Volpicelli, Robert Arntfield, Ignacio Martin-Loeches, Gizella Melania Istrate, František Duška |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 104 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 13% |
| United States | 7 | 7% |
| Mexico | 6 | 6% |
| Spain | 5 | 5% |
| Argentina | 4 | 4% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| Chile | 3 | 3% |
| Belgium | 2 | 2% |
| Sweden | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 19% |
| Unknown | 39 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 72 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 15% |
| Scientists | 9 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 94 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Researcher | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 19% |
| Unknown | 27 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 45% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 30 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2022.
All research outputs
#665,106
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#452
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,370
of 431,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#24
of 211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.