You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Thyroid hemiagenesis and Hashimoto’s thyroditis—diagnostic and treatment pitfalls
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12957-017-1250-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Minghao Wang, Lingmi Hou, Maoshan Chen, Lin Ren, Peng Tang, Yi Zhang, Jun Jiang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 31% |
| Psychology | 2 | 15% |
| Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,118,542
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#10
of 2,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,997
of 323,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,065 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.