↓ Skip to main content

Integrating guideline development and implementation: analysis of guideline development manual instructions for generating implementation advice

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Integrating guideline development and implementation: analysis of guideline development manual instructions for generating implementation advice
Published in
Implementation Science, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-7-67
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna R Gagliardi, Melissa C Brouwers

Abstract

Guidelines are important tools that inform healthcare delivery based on best available research evidence. Guideline use is in part based on quality of the guidelines, which includes advice for implementation and has been shown to vary. Others hypothesized this is due to limited instructions in guideline development manuals. The purpose of this study was to examine manual instructions for implementation advice.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 4 3%
Peru 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Norway 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 101 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 19%
Student > Master 16 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Lecturer 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 33 29%
Unknown 15 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 12%
Social Sciences 13 11%
Psychology 8 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 25 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2014.
All research outputs
#4,225,087
of 21,735,696 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#855
of 1,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,351
of 143,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,735,696 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.