Title |
Why don't hospital staff activate the rapid response system (RRS)? How frequently is it needed and can the process be improved?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Implementation Science, April 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-6-39 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Stuart D Marshall, Simon Kitto, William Shearer, Stuart J Wilson, Monica A Finnigan, Tamica Sturgess, Tonina Hore, Michael D Buist |
Abstract |
The rapid response system (RRS) is a process of accessing help for health professionals when a patient under their care becomes severely ill. Recent studies and meta-analyses show a reduction in cardiac arrests by a one-third in hospitals that have introduced a rapid response team, although the effect on overall hospital mortality is less clear. It has been suggested that the difficulty in establishing the benefit of the RRS has been due to implementation difficulties and a reluctance of clinical staff to call for additional help. This assertion is supported by the observation that patients continue to have poor outcomes in our institution despite an established RRS being available. In many of these cases, the patient is often unstable for many hours or days without help being sought. These poor outcomes are often discovered in an ad hoc fashion, and the real numbers of patients who may benefit from the RRS is currently unknown. This study has been designed to answer three key questions to improve the RRS: estimate the scope of the problem in terms of numbers of patients requiring activation of the RRS; determine cognitive and socio-cultural barriers to calling the Rapid Response Team; and design and implement solutions to address the effectiveness of the RRS. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 50% |
United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 2 | 2% |
Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 1% |
Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 93 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 12% |
Researcher | 11 | 11% |
Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
Lecturer | 9 | 9% |
Other | 7 | 7% |
Other | 28 | 29% |
Unknown | 21 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 36% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 7% |
Psychology | 6 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 6% |
Unknown | 28 | 29% |