↓ Skip to main content

Managing menstruation in the workplace: an overlooked issue in low- and middle-income countries

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal for Equity in Health, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
39 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
282 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Managing menstruation in the workplace: an overlooked issue in low- and middle-income countries
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12939-016-0379-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marni Sommer, Sahani Chandraratna, Sue Cavill, Therese Mahon, Penelope Phillips-Howard

Abstract

The potential menstrual hygiene management barriers faced by adolescent girls and women in workplace environments in low- and middle-income countries has been under addressed in research, programming and policy. Despite global efforts to reduce poverty among women in such contexts, there has been insufficient attention to the water and sanitation related barriers, specifically in relation to managing monthly menstruation, that may hinder girls' and women's contributions to the workplace, and their health and wellbeing. There is an urgent need to document the specific social and environmental barriers they may be facing in relation to menstrual management, to conduct a costing of the implications of inadequate supportive workplace environments for menstrual hygiene management, and to understand the implications for girls' and women's health and wellbeing. This will provide essential evidence for guiding national policy makers, the private sector, donors and activists focused on advancing girls' and women's rights.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 282 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 281 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 18%
Researcher 31 11%
Student > Bachelor 30 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 9%
Lecturer 15 5%
Other 34 12%
Unknown 97 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 46 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 14 5%
Environmental Science 10 4%
Other 43 15%
Unknown 110 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2023.
All research outputs
#805,061
of 25,528,120 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#94
of 2,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,288
of 355,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#4
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,528,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,247 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.