| Title |
Single ventilator for multiple patients during COVID19 surge: matching and balancing patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03041-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lonnie G. Petersen, James Friend, Sidney Merritt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 8 | 31% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 16 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 16 | 30% |
| Unknown | 12 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 39% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 15 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,372,499
of 25,816,430 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,066
of 6,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,942
of 435,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#81
of 225 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,816,430 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,627 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.