| Title |
COVID-19: a hypothesis regarding the ventilation-perfusion mismatch
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03125-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mario G. Santamarina, Dominique Boisier, Roberto Contreras, Martiniano Baque, Mariano Volpacchio, Ignacio Beddings |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 185 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 17 | 9% |
| United States | 13 | 7% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 12 | 6% |
| Ecuador | 5 | 3% |
| Spain | 5 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| India | 4 | 2% |
| Colombia | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Unknown | 103 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 167 | 90% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 5% |
| Scientists | 7 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 128 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 13% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
| Researcher | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 33 | 26% |
| Unknown | 30 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 64 | 50% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 39 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 130. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2022.
All research outputs
#328,509
of 25,820,938 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#169
of 6,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,345
of 432,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#4
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,820,938 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.