You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Anthocyanin, a novel and user-friendly reporter for convenient, non-destructive, low cost, directly visual selection of transgenic hairy roots in the study of rhizobia-legume symbiosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-020-00638-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yinglun Fan, Xiuyuan Wang, Haiyun Li, Shuang Liu, Liangshen Jin, Yanyan Lyu, Mengdi Shi, Sirui Liu, Xinyue Yang, Shanhua Lyu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Russia | 2 | 7% |
| India | 2 | 7% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Israel | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Poland | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 16 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 78% |
| Scientists | 5 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 8 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 52% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2022.
All research outputs
#2,225,057
of 24,900,093 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#99
of 1,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,933
of 403,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#4
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,900,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,216 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.