You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A comparison of passive surveillance and active cluster-based surveillance for dengue fever in southern coastal Ecuador
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-020-09168-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Melissa Vitale, Christina D. Lupone, Aileen Kenneson-Adams, Robinson Jaramillo Ochoa, Tania Ordoñez, Efráin Beltran-Ayala, Timothy P. Endy, Paula F. Rosenbaum, Anna M. Stewart-Ibarra |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 74 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 20% |
| Unknown | 28 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 31 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2020.
All research outputs
#6,553,692
of 23,220,133 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,919
of 15,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,966
of 397,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#170
of 349 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,220,133 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,371 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 349 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.