Inappropriate statistical method in a parallel-group randomized controlled trial results in unsubstantiated conclusions

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, June 2016

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

So far, Altmetric has seen 26 X posts from 25 X users, with an upper bound of 189,644 followers.

循環器病リスクを有する男性への亜麻仁 vs 米の炎症マーカーへの有効性に関する研究の撤回事例を読み込めたのもよかった。 https://t.co/z0Wh9qxMES https://t.co/zr4IEsJTxJ https://t.co/0IoaQZwVJP

RT @yachu93: Letter to the Editorで，Spinの疑いを出して，Retractionに持ち込んでいる事例を発見。こんなこと，やるものなのかと関心。 https://t.co/41z1EiX00D

RT @yachu93: Letter to the Editorで，Spinの疑いを出して，Retractionに持ち込んでいる事例を発見。こんなこと，やるものなのかと関心。 https://t.co/41z1EiX00D

Letter to the Editorで，Spinの疑いを出して，Retractionに持ち込んでいる事例を発見。こんなこと，やるものなのかと関心。 https://t.co/41z1EiX00D

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output.

Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 22 additional X posts.