You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Promoting routine syphilis screening among men who have sex with men in China: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of syphilis self-testing and lottery incentive
BMC Infectious Diseases, June 2020
Weibin Cheng, Cheng Wang, Weiming Tang, Jason J. Ong, Hongyun Fu, Michael Marks, M. Kumi Smith, Changchang Li, Juan Nie, Peizhen Zhao, Heping Zheng, Bin Yang, Joseph D. Tucker
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||4||50%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||2||25%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||14||13%|
|Student > Master||13||12%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||7||7%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||20||19%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||14||13%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2020.
All research outputs
of 24,838,271 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
of 8,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 404,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,838,271 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,352 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,639 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.