↓ Skip to main content

Assessing methods for measurement of clinical outcomes and quality of care in primary care practices

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing methods for measurement of clinical outcomes and quality of care in primary care practices
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-12-214
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael E Green, William Hogg, Colleen Savage, Sharon Johnston, Grant Russell, R Liisa Jaakkimainen, Richard H Glazier, Janet Barnsley, Richard Birtwhistle

Abstract

To evaluate the appropriateness of potential data sources for the population of performance indicators for primary care (PC) practices.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 108 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 20%
Student > Master 18 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 15 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 10%
Social Sciences 9 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 8%
Psychology 6 5%
Other 22 19%
Unknown 20 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2012.
All research outputs
#6,327,819
of 12,372,945 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#2,019
of 4,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,244
of 121,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#25
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,372,945 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.