↓ Skip to main content

Assessing methods for measurement of clinical outcomes and quality of care in primary care practices

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing methods for measurement of clinical outcomes and quality of care in primary care practices
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-12-214
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael E Green, William Hogg, Colleen Savage, Sharon Johnston, Grant Russell, R Liisa Jaakkimainen, Richard H Glazier, Janet Barnsley, Richard Birtwhistle

Abstract

To evaluate the appropriateness of potential data sources for the population of performance indicators for primary care (PC) practices.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 126 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 19%
Student > Master 20 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 26 20%
Unknown 22 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 8%
Social Sciences 9 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 6%
Psychology 8 6%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 29 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2012.
All research outputs
#12,664,757
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,145
of 7,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,160
of 164,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#65
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.