You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Highly diluted medication reduces parasitemia and improves experimental infection evolution by Trypanosoma cruzi
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Research Notes, July 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1756-0500-5-352 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Denise Lessa Aleixo, Fabiana Nabarro Ferraz, Érika Cristina Ferreira, Marta de Lana, Mônica Lúcia Gomes, Benício Alves de Abreu Filho, Silvana Marques de Araújo |
Abstract |
There is no published information about the use of different protocols to administer a highly diluted medication.Evaluate the effect of different protocols for treatment with biotherapic T. cruzi 17 dH (BIOT(Tc17dH)) on clinical/parasitological evolution of mice infected with T. cruzi-Y strain. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 9 | 38% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 17% |
Spain | 1 | 4% |
India | 1 | 4% |
Qatar | 1 | 4% |
Norway | 1 | 4% |
Canada | 1 | 4% |
France | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 5 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 19 | 79% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 17% |
Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 3% |
Argentina | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 34 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 28% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 14% |
Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 14% |
Unknown | 4 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 19% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 17% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 14% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 8% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 25% |
Unknown | 4 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2017.
All research outputs
#1,948,646
of 24,366,830 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#231
of 4,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,763
of 167,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#7
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,366,830 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.