↓ Skip to main content

Costs and consequences of treatment for mild gestational diabetes mellitus – evaluation from the ACHOIS randomised trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Costs and consequences of treatment for mild gestational diabetes mellitus – evaluation from the ACHOIS randomised trial
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, October 2007
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-7-27
Pubmed ID
Authors

John R Moss, Caroline A Crowther, Janet E Hiller, Kristyn J Willson, Jeffrey S Robinson, The Australian Carbohydrate Intolerance Study in Pregnant Women (ACHOIS) Trial Group

Abstract

Recommended best practice is that economic evaluation of health care interventions should be integral with randomised clinical trials. We performed a cost-consequence analysis of treating women with mild gestational diabetes mellitus by dietary advice, blood glucose monitoring and insulin therapy as needed compared with routine pregnancy care, using patient-level data from a multi-centre randomised clinical trial. Women with a singleton pregnancy who had mild gestational diabetes diagnosed by an oral glucose-tolerance test between 24 and 34 weeks' gestation and their infants were included. Clinical outcomes and outpatient costs derived from all women and infants in the trial. Inpatient costs derived from women and infants attending the hospital contributing the largest number of enrolments (26.1%), and charges to women and their families derived from a subsample of participants from that hospital (in 2002 Australian dollars). Occasions of service and health outcomes were adjusted for maternal age, ethnicity and parity. Analysis of variance was used with bootstrapping to confirm results. Primary clinical outcomes were serious perinatal complications; admission to neonatal nursery; jaundice requiring phototherapy; induction of labour and caesarean delivery. Economic outcome measures were outpatient and inpatient costs, and charges to women and their families. For every 100 women with a singleton pregnancy and positive oral glucose tolerance test who were offered treatment for mild gestational diabetes mellitus in addition to routine obstetric care, $53,985 additional direct costs were incurred at the obstetric hospital, $6,521 additional charges were incurred by women and their families, 9.7 additional women experienced induction of labour, and 8.6 more babies were admitted to a neonatal nursery. However, 2.2 fewer babies experienced serious perinatal complication and 1.0 fewer babies experienced perinatal death. The incremental cost per additional serious perinatal complication prevented was $27,503, per perinatal death prevented was $60,506 and per discounted life-year gained was $2,988. It is likely that the general public in high-income countries such as Australia would find reductions in perinatal mortality and in serious perinatal complications sufficient to justify additional health service and personal monetary charges. Over the whole lifespan, the incremental cost per extra life-year gained is highly favourable. Australian Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12606000294550.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 181 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 18%
Researcher 28 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 10%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Other 11 6%
Other 37 20%
Unknown 45 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 10%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Psychology 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 26 14%
Unknown 50 27%