You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Quantification of left ventricular remodeling in response to isolated aortic or mitral regurgitation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, May 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1532-429x-12-32 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Seth Uretsky, Azhar Supariwala, Puspalatha Nidadovolu, Surinder S Khokhar, Cindy Comeau, Oleg Shubayev, Francesca Campanile, Steven D Wolff |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 65 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 20% |
| Researcher | 13 | 19% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 11 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 60% |
| Engineering | 7 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2020.
All research outputs
#15,748,014
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#978
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,933
of 105,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.